There is such controversy among doctors and parents about whether or not vaccines cause autism. I've done some research. I've read lots from both sides of the argument. And I'm not convinced that vaccines cause autism. But I'm also not convinced that vaccines do not cause autism. And, in addition, I have concerns about injecting my baby with chemicals and questionable substances.
From Generation Rescue's web site:
"Many vaccines contain other toxic substances including ethylene glycol (antifreeze), phenol (a disinfectant dye), benzethonium chloride (a disinfectant), formaldehyde (a preservative and disinfectant), and aluminum (another known neuro-toxin). Further, some viruses used in vaccines are cultured in animal tissue including chicken albumin and monkey liver."
Both sides of this debate feel strongly (to put it mildly) about their position. And parents get caught in the confusing middle.
According to the AAP's web site, antifreeze is not an ingredient in vaccines:
"Q. Do vaccines contain antifreeze?
A: No. Antifreeze is typically made of ethylene glycol, which is unsafe. Polyethylene glycol (a
chemical used in antifreeze and personal care products like skin creams and toothpaste) is
used in vaccines and is safe. It is used to inactivate the influenza virus in some influenza
vaccines. It is also used to purify other vaccines."
What's a parent to do? Who can you believe?
I'd been fretting for weeks, knowing that my son's 12-month pediatrician visit was looming. I knew that our pediatrician, who begrudgingly allows my alternative vaccination schedule, would press us to accept the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine. I didn't want him to get it. I prepared myself for a fight and I knew that one possible outcome would be for our doctor to dump us from his practice. That was a chance I was willing to take although I do like and respect this doctor and would have hated to find someone new.
But when it's all said and done, as a parent, you have to go with your gut. And my gut's been telling me that our son is not ready for several of these vaccines.
When our doctor reminded me, at the start of our visit, that Waylon was due for three shots (a total of five vaccines, three of which are live viruses) I told him that, actually, Waylon was not having any shots today. I explained that I'm not saying no to these vaccines forever. I realize their importance both for my son and for the larger community in which we live. But I am not ready for my baby boy to receive all of these vaccines just yet. I want time for his immune system to grow and mature. He is breast-fed, he is home with me and I see no reason why a baby this young with minimal exposure to disease needs that many vaccines at one visit. Autism concerns and questions aside, I have grave reservations about injecting three live viruses into my baby all at once and stressing out his immature immune system.
Our pediatrician, while not thrilled with my decision, went along with it. He wasn't snarky or nasty or combative. He just shrugged his shoulders, said he wished he could change my mind and then pressed his practice's pro-vaccine literature into my hand once again. I respect him and listen to his arguments for the vaccines each time we visit him. And, thankfully, he respectfully listens to my concerns without making me feel like a crackpot.
I know that doctors believe in supporting the AAP and the status quo. I know they believe that administering vaccines is in the best interest of our children and of all children. But I hope our doctor also understands that by educating myself about vaccines, by researching them and, yes, even by questioning the schedule and the ingredients in them that I am doing what is in the best interest of my child. No parent should be faulted for that.
[photo credit: The Delaney Diaries]
